: |
|
1109 |
Province: |
|
Western Cape |
Country: |
|
South Africa |
Locus: |
|
3318DC |
Observer: |
|
Witberg M. & Neumann J. |
Date of record: |
|
2006-02-28 |
Number of photos: |
|
1 |
Notes: |
|
|
Last updated: |
|
2023-09-27 17:37:27 |
Sp. code: |
|
4890 |
Species name: |
|
Psammophis notostictus |
Common name: |
|
Karoo Sand Snake |
Family: |
|
Lamprophiidae |
Record status: |
|
ACCEPTED |
Collector's species id: |
|
|
Institution: |
|
ADU-UCT |
Record URL: |
|
https://vmus.adu.org.za/?vm=-1109 |
Links: |
|
• Locus: Summary | Records • Species: Records | Distribution map |
|
[/001109-1.jpg image not available]
|
|
Comments by the Expert Panel on this record:
|
Comment number: |
|
1 |
By: |
|
Mike Bates |
Comment: |
|
Cape Sand Snake feeding on a ranid frog. |
Date: |
|
2006-06-01 12:19:03 |
Species name: |
|
Psammophis leightoni -- Cape Sand Snake |
Species code: |
|
4860 |
|
Comment number: |
|
2 |
By: |
|
James Harrison |
Comment: |
|
At original size, the photo permits elimination of P. notostictus, leaving crucifer and leightoni as possibilities. Of the two, crucifer appears more likely (also from non-sandy substrate), but not definite. |
Date: |
|
2006-06-05 22:28:14 |
Species name: |
|
|
Species code: |
|
0 |
|
Comment number: |
|
3 |
By: |
|
Andrew Turner |
Comment: |
|
I suggest that this is indeed P. notostictus. It is defintiely not crucifer and does not resemble SW Cape leightoni. |
Date: |
|
2006-11-17 11:57:25 |
Species name: |
|
Psammophis notostictus -- Karoo Sand Snake |
Species code: |
|
4890 |
|
Comment number: |
|
4 |
By: |
|
Marius Burger |
Comment: |
|
I'm with Andrew. |
Date: |
|
2007-03-18 19:28:43 |
Species name: |
|
Psammophis notostictus -- Karoo Sand Snake |
Species code: |
|
4890 |
|
Comment number: |
|
5 |
By: |
|
Comments by several members of expert panel |
Comment: |
|
|
Date: |
|
2013-05-16 14:37:07 |
Species name: |
|
Psammophis notostictus -- Karoo Sand Snake |
Species code: |
|
4890 |
|