: |
|
1243 |
Province: |
|
Limpopo |
Country: |
|
South Africa |
Locus: |
|
2229AB |
Observer: |
|
De Wijn M.L. |
Date of record: |
|
2008-02-04 |
Number of photos: |
|
1 |
Notes: |
|
|
Last updated: |
|
0000-00-00 00:00:00 |
Sp. code: |
|
411820 |
Species name: |
|
Acraea natalica |
Common name: |
|
Black-based acraea -- Mosaiek rooitjie |
Family: |
|
NYMPHALIDAE |
Record status: |
|
ACCEPTED |
Collector's species id: |
|
|
Institution: |
|
ADU-UCT |
Record URL: |
|
https://vmus.adu.org.za/?vm=-1243 |
Links: |
|
• Locus: Summary | Records • Species: Records | Distribution map |
|
[/001243-1.jpg image not available]
|
|
Comments by the Expert Panel on this record:
|
Comment number: |
|
1 |
By: |
|
Andre Coetzer |
Comment: |
|
I would go for A.lygus / A.stenobea because of the light coloured abdomen. Could also be A.natalica though! |
Date: |
|
2009-05-14 15:53:51 |
Species name: |
|
Acraea natalica -- Black-based acraea; Mosaiek rooitjie |
Species code: |
|
411820 |
|
Comment number: |
|
2 |
By: |
|
Steve Woodhall |
Comment: |
|
Both A.lygus and A.stenobea have sparser underside hw spotting than this. Male A.caldarena also has light coloured abdomen. More chance of it being A.natalica and having had a really careful look at the basal hw spots I agree with you on this. |
Date: |
|
2009-05-14 15:53:51 |
Species name: |
|
Acraea natalica -- Black-based acraea; Mosaiek rooitjie |
Species code: |
|
411820 |
|